<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fault Isolative Architectures or “Swimlaning”</title>
	<atom:link href="http://akfpartners.com/techblog/2008/05/30/fault-isolative-architectures-or-%e2%80%9cswimlaning%e2%80%9d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://akfpartners.com/techblog/2008/05/30/fault-isolative-architectures-or-%e2%80%9cswimlaning%e2%80%9d/</link>
	<description>The Scalability Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 04:02:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Revisiting the 1:10:100 Rule &#124; AKF Partners Blog</title>
		<link>http://akfpartners.com/techblog/2008/05/30/fault-isolative-architectures-or-%e2%80%9cswimlaning%e2%80%9d/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Revisiting the 1:10:100 Rule &#124; AKF Partners Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akf-consulting.com/techblog/2008/05/30/fault-isolative-architectures-or-%e2%80%9cswimlaning%e2%80%9d/#comment-69</guid>
		<description>[...] as it applies to technology architectures.  Swimlaning, as we&#8217;ve written about on this blog as well as in the book, is the extreme application of the “shard” or “pod” concept to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as it applies to technology architectures.  Swimlaning, as we&#8217;ve written about on this blog as well as in the book, is the extreme application of the “shard” or “pod” concept to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Fault Isolative Architectures or “Swimlaning” &#124; AKF Partners Blog -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://akfpartners.com/techblog/2008/05/30/fault-isolative-architectures-or-%e2%80%9cswimlaning%e2%80%9d/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Fault Isolative Architectures or “Swimlaning” &#124; AKF Partners Blog -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 09:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akf-consulting.com/techblog/2008/05/30/fault-isolative-architectures-or-%e2%80%9cswimlaning%e2%80%9d/#comment-68</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Sergio Bossa, Baronne Mouton. Baronne Mouton said: Fault Isolative Architectures or “Swimlaning” &#124; AKF Partners Blog http://ow.ly/16bU6D [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Sergio Bossa, Baronne Mouton. Baronne Mouton said: Fault Isolative Architectures or “Swimlaning” | AKF Partners Blog <a href="http://ow.ly/16bU6D" rel="nofollow">http://ow.ly/16bU6D</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top 10 Internet Startup Scalability Killers &#8211; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://akfpartners.com/techblog/2008/05/30/fault-isolative-architectures-or-%e2%80%9cswimlaning%e2%80%9d/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 10 Internet Startup Scalability Killers &#8211; GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 02:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akf-consulting.com/techblog/2008/05/30/fault-isolative-architectures-or-%e2%80%9cswimlaning%e2%80%9d/#comment-67</guid>
		<description>[...] failures in certain components don&#8217;t impact other zones of functionality. We refer to these fault isolation zones as “swim [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] failures in certain components don&#8217;t impact other zones of functionality. We refer to these fault isolation zones as “swim [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abbott, Keeven, Fisher &#38;#038 Fortuna Consulting</title>
		<link>http://akfpartners.com/techblog/2008/05/30/fault-isolative-architectures-or-%e2%80%9cswimlaning%e2%80%9d/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Abbott, Keeven, Fisher &#38;#038 Fortuna Consulting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 14:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://akf-consulting.com/techblog/2008/05/30/fault-isolative-architectures-or-%e2%80%9cswimlaning%e2%80%9d/#comment-66</guid>
		<description>[...] The next step is to implement systems that answer the question of “which systems are causing the problem”?.  In the ideal world you will have developed a fault isolative architecture to create “failure domains” that will isolate failures and help you determine the systems causing the problem.  Failing that, you need monitoring that can help indicate the rough areas of concern.  These are typically aggregated system statistics and monitoring similar to the real time application monitoring above (susbsystem X is throwing errors at a rate 3 standard deviations above normal) or aggregated load, cpu, etc for a group of systems (rather than a single system).  You want to ensure that this level of monitoring does not create a level of noise that forces your team to ignore the alerts. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The next step is to implement systems that answer the question of “which systems are causing the problem”?.  In the ideal world you will have developed a fault isolative architecture to create “failure domains” that will isolate failures and help you determine the systems causing the problem.  Failing that, you need monitoring that can help indicate the rough areas of concern.  These are typically aggregated system statistics and monitoring similar to the real time application monitoring above (susbsystem X is throwing errors at a rate 3 standard deviations above normal) or aggregated load, cpu, etc for a group of systems (rather than a single system).  You want to ensure that this level of monitoring does not create a level of noise that forces your team to ignore the alerts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

